# Aristotle #
## Historical Background ##
## Quest for Substance ##
## Naturalness ##
## Teleology ##
## Virtue ##
## Man is a Political Animal ##
# Categories #
## "Said of a Subject" ##
## "In a Subject" ## > I call "in a subject" what is in something, not as a part, and > cannot exist separately from what it is in. > (1a)
> Some are neither in a subject not said of a subject, for example > the individual man or the individual horse. > (1b)
## Substance ## (οὐσία) What is most fundamental?
## Primary vs. Secondary Substance ##
## Substance vs. Quality ##
> Said by itself, each of the things mentioned above is no > assertion, but, in combination with others of these, it becomes > an assertion. For it seems that every assertion is either true > or false; > (9b--10a)
## Definition ##
> It is because they are subjects for everything else that primary > substances are most properly called substances. > (3a)
> Each substance seems to signify a particular THIS. As far as > primary substances are concerned, it is indisputable true that > each signifies a particular THIS, for what is indicated is > individual and one in number. > (10a)
> As far as secondary substances are concerned, it seems from the > appearance of the name when one says "man" or "animal" that they, > too, signify a particular THIS. But it is not really so. > Rather, each signifies a particular SORT. > (10a)
## Change ##
# On The Heavens #
## Circular Motion ## 1. Simplicity 2. Nature 3. Completeness
> From all these premises therefore it clearly follows that there > exists some physical substance besides the four in our sublunary > world, and moreover that it is more divine than, and prior to, > all these. > (269a)
## Elements ## 1. Finite 2. Not Eternal
Again, what is most fundamental?
# Metaphysics IV #
## First Philosophy ## > There is a science that studies being in so far as it is being, > and also the properties of being in its own right. It is not the > same as any of the so called special sciences. For none of them > considers being quite generally, in so far as it is being. > (933a)
## Pros Hen Predication ## > Similarly, then, being is spoken of in many ways, but in all > cases it is spoken of with reference to one principle. > (1003b)
> Being and unity are the same and a single nature, since they > imply each other. > (1003b)
## Philosophy vs. Geometry ##
## The Firmest Principle of All ## > It is impossible for the same thing both to belong and not belong > at the same time to the same thing and in the same respect. > (1005b)
## So What is Philosophy? ##
# Metaphysics VII #
## What is Substance? ## - Form? - Matter? - Composite?
## Form ##
## Matter ##
## Composite ##
## Essence ## (the-what-it-was-to-be)
> Now, a composite is composed of something in such a way that the > whole thing is one, not as a heap is, but as a syllable is. A > syllable is not the same as its letters---for instance, B and A > are not the same thing as BA. > (1041b)
> Now this is the substance of a given thing; for this is the > primary cause of the thing's being [what it is]. Some things are > not substance, but the things that are substances are naturally > constituted; hence this nature---the one that is not an element > but a principle---will apparently be substance. > (1041b)
# Metaphysics XII #
## Prime Mover ## > And since whatever both is moved and initiates motion is an > intermediary, there is something that initiated motion without > being moved, something that is everlasting and a substance and > actuality. > (1072a)
## Pure Actuality ## > But since there is something that initiates motion without itself > being moved, and this is actually operating, it cannot be > otherwise in any respect at all. > (1072b)
## Pure Understanding ## > Understanding in its own right is of what is best in its own > right, and the highest degree of understanding is of what is best > to the highest degree in its own right. And understanding > understands itself by sharing the character of the object of > understanding. > (1072b)
## Pure Life ## > Further, life belongs to the god. For the actuality of > understanding is life, and the god is that actuality. > (1072b)
## Narcissistic? ## > [The divine understanding], then, must understand itself, so that > its understanding is an understanding of understanding. > (1074b)